Federal Bureaucrats Are Quietly Shaping Wisconsin Policy

Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Federal Bureaucrats Are Quietly Shaping Wisconsin Policy

October 11, 2025 - 07:37
Posted in:
1 comments

A new report from the Institute for Reforming Government (IRG) exposes how unelected federal bureaucrats are quietly steering Wisconsin policy through informal “guidance documents.” These documents often carry the weight of regulation without ever going before the Legislature or the public.

What IRG found:

IRG identified 14 examples across five major state agencies—including the Departments of Natural Resources, Health Services, Agriculture, Transportation, and the Wisconsin Elections Commission—where Washington directives shaped Wisconsin policy.

Why it matters:

Bureaucrats in D.C. are quietly rewriting Wisconsin’s rules without legislative approval. According to IRG polling:

32% of Wisconsinites say lawmakers—not bureaucrats—should make major policy decisions.

Only 8% think state agencies should take the lead.

What IRG is saying:

“Unelected federal bureaucrats often set policy for Wisconsin from behind the scenes, unbeknownst to the people’s duly elected representatives,” said Jake Curtis, IRG General Counsel. “Our elected officials, not bureaucrats in Washington, should be calling the shots. Wisconsin must lead the way in reminding Washington and state leaders that our Constitution starts with the states, not the other way around.”

What’s next:

Jake Curtis will testify at a joint Wisconsin Senate Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs and Assembly Committee on Government Operations, Accountability, and Transparency hearing at 10:00AM on Thursday to discuss the report’s findings and how lawmakers can reclaim authority from federal agencies.

View the full release and report

There is 1 Comment

I will give you a perfect example of this. Back in the Governor Doyle administration, the DNR expanded its authority significantly. It was generally accepted that they had "Rule-Making Authority". They made new rules, and they spent lots of money from the Stewardship fund, which they should not have. Along came a Republican administration, and the DNR was severely restructured.

The damage they did in those years was devastating in many ways. People's property rights were abused, government regulation was expanded, and it was a harsh world dealing with the DNR.

Yes, it is critical that we do not have unelected people making policy or laws.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.