A few weeks ago, we shared the truth about state Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel amid massive disinformation campaigns waged by dark money PACs. The Left is scared of seeing an ethical judge focused on upholding the rule of law appointed to Wisconsin’s Supreme Court, so they have spent millions trying to convince voters that candidate Susan Crawford is the answer to our state's problems. But we know the truth. Crawford has spent decades undermining Wisconsinites’ best interests, and she will not behave differently if elected to the state Supreme Court.

Vulgar, Blasphemous, Indecent Associations
Recently, socialist Bernie Sanders came to Wisconsin to support Susan Crawford’s candidacy. At the rally, a transgender musician played a vile song filled with blasphemy about our holy God. The lyrics are so inappropriate we strongly suggest that you don’t look them up and read them.

Then just last week, news broke that “[a] cross-dressing Democrat donor held a ‘Disney Princess Bingo’ ‘drag’ fundraiser” for Crawford. The event ad noted, “Right now more than ever we need to make sure to elect Susan Crawford to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. This is the future of Wisconsin and the LGBTQ+ Community."

This exemplifies all too well what we and others mean when we say Susan Crawford is too extreme for Wisconsin.

Ties to Extreme Abortion Advocates & Transgender Transitions
Susan Crawford is no friend to the unborn. As an attorney, she represented Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin and is now endorsed by their PAC. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin has fought for abortion expansion through all nine months of pregnancy. Important to note is that their national counterpart is the country’s second-largest provider of hormones used to assist in “gender changes.”

Crawford is anything but impartial and has proven where her loyalties lie time and time again. A vote for Crawford is a vote for the abortion lobby that currently has a case before our Supreme Court to make abortion a “constitutional right” in Wisconsin.

Opposition to Parental Rights
Many voters have valid concerns about the future of school choice and parental rights if Susan Crawford is elected to the Supreme Court. Crawford’s husband co-authored a book titled Homeschooling: The History and Philosophy of a Controversial Practice.

The book recommends that litigation on constitutional grounds occur to force legislative action over homeschooling. A Johns Hopkins review argued the book “paint[s] parents and Christians as villains.”

Backed by Those Who Oppose Religious Liberty
Freedom From Religion Foundation Action Fund has endorsed Susan Crawford because they believe that Crawford would be an advocate for restricting religious liberty. One can assume that Freedom From Religion Foundation Action Fund believes that if Crawford is on the Court, she would vote to restrict Wisconsinites’ religious liberty and free speech.

When Freedom From Religion Foundation Action Fund announced their endorsement of Crawford, they highlighted a main reason why: When Brad Schimel was Wisconsin’s top cop, he established a volunteer chaplain program to serve those in Wisconsin’s Department of Justice. Would Freedom From Religion Foundation and Crawford oppose similar volunteer chaplain programs in our local police departments as well?

Please solidify your plans to vote by April 1 and share this email with friends and family so they can learn the truth about Susan Crawford.